On a spring day in April 1996, a lone gunman armed with rapid-fire weapons took the lives of 35 people in the Australian tourist town of Port Arthur.
That horrific event nearly three decades ago, which ushered in some of the toughest weapons policies in the world, can seem like a distant memory for many citizens.
However, the Bondi Beach attack this past Sunday, which claimed 15 lives, has rekindled memories of the Tasmanian tragedy.
A analysis revealed that there are now over four million guns in private hands across the country – a figure that is roughly two times the amount from about 20 years ago.
This means approximately a weapon for each small group of people.
While Queensland has the most registered guns, followed by NSW and Victoria, it is the island state and the NT that have the most guns per person.
The data also contradicts the widespread belief that guns are primarily held by rural residents.
Firearms are common in urban centres, with a significant portion located in major cities.
Critically, there are now firearms concentrated among fewer owners, with the typical gun owner possessing more than four firearms.
Gun control laws in Australia are inconsistent across the country, with a disparate implementation of rules between different jurisdictions.
Broadly speaking, to apply for a gun licence, an individual must be over 18, deemed a "responsible individual", pass a training and safety course, and provide a "genuine reason" for ownership.
The permitted justifications include sport shooting or animal management, competitive shooting, certain occupational requirements, and for collections.
However, significant loopholes remain. For instance, individuals under 18 in some jurisdictions can have use of a firearm from as young as early adolescence.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a comprehensive reform of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a massive buyback of over 650,000 firearms.
Certain types of firearms were banned, and vetting procedures alongside delays for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the removal of "home security" as a valid reason for gun ownership.
In the immediate aftermath the Bondi shooting, political leaders were forceful about the need to tighten gun laws.
A weapons collection initiative was announced, marking the most significant such effort since 1996.
Other proposals now under consideration include:
There are also calls for periodic reassessments of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "individuals can be radicalised" over time.
These proposed changes have met with opposition from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates contend that limiting gun numbers would not have prevented an attack driven by extremist ideology.
They suggest that resources would be better spent combating radicalisation rather than tightening regulations for the vast majority of licensed individuals.
Furthermore, a critical reform from 1996 – a centralised weapon tracking system – remains incomplete, though it has now been listed as a key project.
For campaigners, the Bondi attack is a stark warning that regulations must be updated with new threats.
They argue that strengthening is needed to "remain effective" and safeguard communities.
While mass shootings remain relatively rare in Australia compared to some nations, the risk persists, and the legacy of weapons being misused – through theft – continues to pose a problem.
As one advocate reflected, "It is regrettable that it requires such a devastating event to focus attention and pay heed."
A passionate gaming enthusiast with years of experience in reviewing slot games and sharing insights on casino strategies.